01
Review
A senior technical review of a repository, feature, integration, or decision.
Result: Risks, decisions, and a practical next step.
00 / how I work
I work between product intent and implementation. I understand the context, make the technical call, and stay close enough to the code to own the outcome.
Tell me about the workThe working loop
01
I start with the product goal, the repository and the constraints around the change. I trace the relevant data and behaviour before recommending a direction.
02
I reduce the problem to the smallest sound scope. Trade-offs, risks and boundaries are explained in plain language so the decision is visible.
03
I deliver working code, a focused review, or recommendations your team can execute. The output matches the engagement, but it always ends with a useful next step.
A call, a repository, a Loom, production symptoms or a rough brief can be enough. I ask for the smallest amount of access and context needed to understand the problem, then I trace the relevant code and product behaviour.
I make scope, trade-offs and unknowns visible early. You get direct language, short feedback loops and decisions tied to the product outcome, not an abstract architecture exercise.
Engagement models
01
A senior technical review of a repository, feature, integration, or decision.
Result: Risks, decisions, and a practical next step.
02
I design and implement the feature, integration, or backend change.
Result: Working, reviewed software.
03
Fractional senior engineering support for decisions, implementation, and code review.
Result: Senior ownership without another full-time hire.
AI in the workflow
Codebase exploration, focused prototypes, test scaffolding and repetitive implementation. I use it where faster feedback improves the work.
Product trade-offs, architecture, data flow, security, failure modes, review and the decision that a change is ready to ship.
Start with the work in front of you. The right model becomes clear once the problem is understood.